Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1 of 212next »

מקווה שנהנתם ונתרמתם מתהליך העבודה על הפרוייקטים. במהלך היום כל קבוצה תקבל אימייל עם משוב על הפרוייקט. הציונים הסופיים של הקורס יתעדכנו במידע האישי בקרוב.

שנה טובה וגמר חתימה טובה,
כנרת

משובים וציונים by KineretSKineretS, 28 Sep 2017 11:29

You need to define all the relevant basic definitions that are relevant to the main results.

Re: survey size by KineretSKineretS, 30 Jul 2017 14:29

I agree. There is no need to give all the details of each proof.

Re: survey - too long proof by KineretSKineretS, 30 Jul 2017 14:27

Hi,
Another question. How broad should the survey should be in the case that the article is using previous results?
To be more specific, in our case one article we survey use mechanisms, VGC, revelation principle, DISC ant etc.
Should we insert state and define all of those formally or we can just use them with cite (assume the reader is aware of them)?

Thanks,
Alon

survey size by YomasYomasYomasYomas, 20 Jul 2017 14:33

Hi,
proofs can make the survey exceed the 10 pages limit. We have few options what to do:
1. just give short proof sketch and reference to the article
2. survey less - less algorithm and results
3. exceed the limit

I think option one is the best. what do you think?

survey - too long proof by YomasYomasYomasYomas, 19 Jul 2017 16:06
Re: Survey
KineretSKineretS 16 Jun 2017 12:08
in discussion Discussions / Spring 2017 Forum » Survey

This was answered in class. If there is still an ambiguity I will be happy to clarify.

Re: Survey by KineretSKineretS, 16 Jun 2017 12:08
Survey
Efrat AbramovitzEfrat Abramovitz 13 Jun 2017 07:04
in discussion Discussions / Spring 2017 Forum » Survey

I didn't fully understand what will the survey work include.
Is there a written explanation somewhere?

Survey by Efrat AbramovitzEfrat Abramovitz, 13 Jun 2017 07:04
Re: userDSIC
userDSICuserDSIC 28 May 2017 17:42
in discussion Discussions / Spring 2017 Forum » userDSIC

can't delete it :(

Re: userDSIC by userDSICuserDSIC, 28 May 2017 17:42
HW2 Q3
userDSICuserDSIC 28 May 2017 17:41
in discussion Discussions / Spring 2017 Forum » HW2 Q3

It looks like question 3 assume prior knowledge, but I don't recall that we cover this material in class.
I found this material in last year scribes, lectures 5 and 6.
agttau-2016DOTwikidotDOTcom/scribe-notes
you welcome

HW2 Q3 by userDSICuserDSIC, 28 May 2017 17:41
userDSIC
userDSICuserDSIC 28 May 2017 17:38
in discussion Discussions / Spring 2017 Forum » userDSIC

userDSIC

userDSIC by userDSICuserDSIC, 28 May 2017 17:38

If you wrote it using latex or word you can email it to me. If not, please submit the hard copy.

Re: Assignment submittion by KineretSKineretS, 24 Apr 2017 13:58

Hey,

Can we submit a scan of our solution somehow or we must hand it physiclly to Schriber?

Assignment submittion by Matan YossefMatan Yossef, 24 Apr 2017 05:50

1. Each agent indeed wishes to minimize her cost.
2. You are correct that the set of valid strategies for player i contains exactly the paths of length l_i. But note that, as was written in the question, an agent can use an edge multiple times. Meaning that if for example, l_i = 3, and there is a cycle of length 2: s -> v -> s for some node v in the graph, a valid strategy for that player would be s -> v -> s -> v (which contains only 2 edges, but uses (s,v) twice).

Re: Homework 1 Q6 by KineretSKineretS, 21 Apr 2017 21:05

I wanted to verify that I'm understanding the question correctly:

The strategies available to player i are only paths that have a length of exactly l_i from s (meaning the game is defined only on graphs for which there are such paths for each player), and each player is seeking to minimize his cost?

Homework 1 Q6 by Jonathan_GJonathan_G, 21 Apr 2017 11:04

minimize the expected makespan

1. either
2. the strategy of each agent is independent of the other agents (their q's, their strategies)
3. right, but you can interpret a mixed strategy as "splitting" the bits.

Hey, I am looking for a HW partner. If someone is in need of one please send me a message :)

Looking for HW partner by Barak GrossBarak Gross, 14 Apr 2017 16:41

No, sorry. Already found one.

Re: Homework partner by ShlomiShamirShlomiShamir, 14 Apr 2017 05:31

Also, in 3.7, what does it mean for strategies to "together minimize the makespan"?

  • When executed, they always achieve the optimal makespan?
  • The expected makespan is optimal?
  • The expected makespan is minimal among all strategies with properties (1) and (3) (equilibrium and not depending on the other loads)?

Hey Shlomi, are you still looking for a partner?

Re: Homework partner by Barak GrossBarak Gross, 13 Apr 2017 18:32
page 1 of 212next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License